bop_radar: Boppy default (Default)
Author:Ruth Prawer Jhabvala
Published: 1983
In: Granada

When we were orphans had put me in the mood for reading about culture clashes, and I had a couple of secondhand paperback Ruth Prawer Jhabvala novels on my shelf waiting to be read. RPJ is good fallback reading for me as I find her carefully constructed character novels very comfortable fare--the sort of thing that's good 'downtime' reading between incredibly distinctive or original novels. That sounds bad, but really I'm so glad I discovered her.

As usual, A new dominion is about the clash of East and West in India. In this novel, a Western girl falls under the influence of a lecherous guru, an Indian princess languishes around causing trouble, and an English gay guy (or 'aesthete' as the blurb puts it!) crushes on a hot Indian student who is oblivious to the nature of his desire. A solid premise! I thoroughly enjoyed it--I think it's probably my favourite RPJ so far, though I always say that upon finishing, and then they all blur into one in my memory. I particularly enjoyed Sister Margaret, a nun whose common sense attitude is a great contrast to the emotional social tangles the others get themselves into, and who retains a strong sense of her self. Unlike the other characters, she does not long for some communion with 'otherness'--and since the search for this communion either fails or has devastating results for the other characters, she works as a pleasant alternative within the novel. It's possible to read an 'agenda' in this novel--it's social commentary, and it works. RPJ captures the way that a guru or spiritual leader may capture the attention and imagination of an individual to such an extent that they lose all perspective and endanger themselves. The cynicism was ok for me, though I don't necessarily agree that it's valid in all instances. And RPJ does counterbalance with other narrative threads that suggest greater complexity to the relationship of teacher and disciple. RPJ moves around different characters in third-person limited and conveys the way that each character is acting unconsciously.

Verdict: Predictably, a good read.
bop_radar: Boppy default (Default)
Author: Salman Rushdie
Published: 2005
By: Jonathan Cape (Random House)

Another Christmas book, this one destined to remain part of my collection. I have a lovely hardback copy of it. *pets*

Summary: The story is told from four perspectives--a former US ambassador to India, his daughter, her Indian mother and Shalimar the Clown, her mother's husband. It's a circular story in a sense, in that it begins in the 90s, with India (the ambassador's daughter) and then flashes back to explore the events and people that have made her who she is. In typical Rushdie style, everything connects to something else and the flow of cause-and-effect is circuitous, fatalistic and almost mythical in nature. He embues the story with a feeling of destiny, of inescapable fate.

India is the most sympathetic of the characters to me--the most memorable of Rushdie's female characters to date for me. The restless nature that in her mother led to over-indulgence, is present as a strength in India. She's a boxer, an archer, an obsessive control freak and a distant lover, and she is locked in her own world of prophetic or symbolic visions, but she's also grounded in the world of today, the world of Los Angeles, in a believable sense. I enjoyed other aspects of the book and I always enjoy Rushdie's writing, but she's what made it special for me.

Overall, the plot of this book was more intimate than Midnight's Children or The Satanic Verses. It didn't have the connection to greater themes that those two works had, even though I think Rushdie was striving for that. The story is very much framed as being about Kashmir, a region of India where Hindus and Muslims lived in relative harmony until the Indian, Pakistani and US governements and religious fanatics fragment and disrupt the population with devastating consequences. It also explores some post-9/11 anxieties about terrorists and the blurred boundaries between the personal and political. I responded strongly to the personal-political theme and I liked that Rushdie was choosing to explore this. But the other 9/11 links didn't work so well for me. Similarly the inclusion of the Los Angeles race riots was a bit lost on me... but it would be interesting to see what reviewers made of this. (I don't usually read in-depth reviews until I've read the work myself.) For me, this book is a return to form for Rushdie, but it's not his best work. It falls into the 'good solid read' category for me.

Verdict:It will definitely remain part of my collection and I'd be interested in reviews/discussion with anyone else who's read it. (Reminder to self: book club are interested in reading it at some stage.)

Profile

bop_radar: Boppy default (Default)
bop_radar

August 2013

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
1112 1314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 30th, 2025 05:49 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios