Date: 2008-11-15 12:28 am (UTC)
I love it. I think it's heroic and selfless and a very difficult decision but one which ultimately has Chloe's best interests at heart. That's not without problems--I do realise that--because acting without consent is always difficult. But I do believe it's very Superman-ly. Sometimes his future identity will demand that he makes decisions for others in a way that overrides their wishes but looks at the big picture. I know 'rule them with strength' turned out to be Zor-El's line, but I always wondered if this was what 'rule them with strength' could mean. It's a heavy burden of responsibility and it will leave him open to people's anger. In some circumstances I am sure I too would rail against him acting in such a controlling way. But Clark is not acting like a cruel dictator here--he loves Chloe and will continue to love her, but his abilities also place him in a role of looking over/after her. That's not his fault but he does have to acknowledge the reality of that--which he has done here. For a while, that balance was flipped the other way with Chloe 'looking after' Clark and we saw how dangerous that was for her in just the last episode.

Sorry, I'm rambling, but I feel passionately about this!
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

bop_radar: Boppy default (Default)
bop_radar

August 2013

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
1112 1314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 18th, 2025 04:08 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios