Re: part I

Date: 2006-02-05 01:44 am (UTC)
Thanks LaT! I really appreciate the compliment. I guess I'm a symbolism geek. The show just works so well at that level! I always look forward to your comments.

You're right about Clark and Lionel--he really couldn't care right then! That IS kind of great. gnat!Lionel!

Like you I was really relieved to see that Lex has been following Lionel's activities a lot closer than indicated earlier. It's a relief after Lex's apparent hopelessness in eps like Fanatic and so on. The Lionel-Lex power struggles are back on, and that's very exciting! I can't wait for the showdown.

The Jonathan-hagiography was one of the most interesting things about this episode. I found it really convincing, especially since Lana and Lex have also done this with their lost parents. I agree that it's not necessarily a bad thing, especially since in comparison to Lex and Lana, Clark is using Jonathan's iconified memory as a moral compass. [livejournal.com profile] norwich36 pointed out that Lex loses his mother's watch (and rejects her as moral compass) and Lana's memory of her parents is simply an image--not a moral compass. In comparison, Clark has something constructive to carry forward. That the image is not the *true* Jonathan no longer matters. It's very interesting because I think this happens in real life a lot, even if people would rather not acknowledge it.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

bop_radar: Boppy default (Default)
bop_radar

August 2013

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
1112 1314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 6th, 2025 08:40 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios