ext_9094 ([identity profile] bop-radar.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] bop_radar 2006-02-05 01:44 am (UTC)

Re: part I

Thanks LaT! I really appreciate the compliment. I guess I'm a symbolism geek. The show just works so well at that level! I always look forward to your comments.

You're right about Clark and Lionel--he really couldn't care right then! That IS kind of great. gnat!Lionel!

Like you I was really relieved to see that Lex has been following Lionel's activities a lot closer than indicated earlier. It's a relief after Lex's apparent hopelessness in eps like Fanatic and so on. The Lionel-Lex power struggles are back on, and that's very exciting! I can't wait for the showdown.

The Jonathan-hagiography was one of the most interesting things about this episode. I found it really convincing, especially since Lana and Lex have also done this with their lost parents. I agree that it's not necessarily a bad thing, especially since in comparison to Lex and Lana, Clark is using Jonathan's iconified memory as a moral compass. [livejournal.com profile] norwich36 pointed out that Lex loses his mother's watch (and rejects her as moral compass) and Lana's memory of her parents is simply an image--not a moral compass. In comparison, Clark has something constructive to carry forward. That the image is not the *true* Jonathan no longer matters. It's very interesting because I think this happens in real life a lot, even if people would rather not acknowledge it.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting